Jump to content

Tom

Members
  • Content Count

    352
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8
Everything posted by Tom
 
 
  1. Tom

    Not another one...

    You are right Norm, I will have to keep the original set for ploughing I was very lucky with the K161, I'm just hoping the parts are similar on them, no doubt they will all be different!! It definitely is looking like tri-ribs, I was half tempted to go with ags on the front as well like my 312... Tom
  2. Tom

    Not another one...

    Hi all, Not done much on the Cub lately, unfortunately. However, I have picked up some new rear tyres and another K161 engine. Admittedly it is seized but it has been barn stored and looks fairly straight so I can use parts off of it all being well. Has anyone else put 23-8.50 x 12 tyres on a cub before? I mocked it up and I quite like it, not sure what to put on the front though... What do you guys think? Tom
  3. Tom

    Cub Cadet 70

    Looking very nice Ewan, you done a great job on the steering wheel, it looks new!! Tom
  4. Tom

    Not another one...

    Thanks for that Ewan, I appreciate it. It's good news also, handy to know Tom
  5. Tom

    Not another one...

    Hi HeadExam, I fully understand what you are saying and have noticed many small differences in the Kohlers I have owned. The spec number I have for this engine is: 23493E if that is any help to you.. The only problem I can see me having if I were to put a K141/K161/K181 would be fitting the drive pulley and recoil for the drive belt. I'm not too sure if the other Kohlers would have a hole for the dowel on the pulley.. Tom Hi Iain, It may be an idea, and one that I have thought of. The only thing I would be worried about is would it unbalance the flywheel? I know you wouldn't be adding much weight.. That's a very kind offer of you which I may take you up on as, like you say, I don't want to throw sums of money at it and find out there is something else wrong! We will have to have a chat at the weekend Tom
  6. Tom

    Not another one...

    I would imagine so, from what I've read the K141, K161 and K181 are very similar apart from bore size. The 350s run a K141 originally... I was actually thinking of them because they are fairly common, the main downside is they come with the rest of the machine most of the time! Tom
  7. Tom

    Not another one...

    Hi guys, Thanks for your continued help. I'd prefer a recoil really, it's less to go wrong in my opinion. If I did replace the engine I'd like to try and rebuild the original engine and eventually stick it back in. Apparently the recoils are quite uncommon. I know Iains is also a recoil start. I'm definitely going to have to look out for a replacement I think, it's going to be expensive gaining all the parts and in the mean time I can look out for a 7hp. The only thing that worries me is fitting the drive pulley on the flywheel side of the engine, I'm not sure if the Cub kohlers were made any different to other kohlers? Tom
  8. Tom

    Not another one...

    Hi guys, Were the K181s electric start? I imagine so as the 7hp Cub recoil wouldn't fit an 8hp I don't think as it has dowels to help keep it in line, maybe I will have to convert it to electric start too.. They don't make it easy! Tom
  9. Tom

    Not another one...

    Hi Ewan, It's a possibility as long as the bolt pattern is the same on the sump and I can put the recoil on the 8hp as well as the tank and the drive pulley. It's definitely achievable though, the next problem is finding a nice running 8hp, unless you've got one? Tom
  10. Tom

    Not another one...

    Had the engine on the bench today and inspected further into it. Not great news unfortunately, bearing plate is broken on the side; I'm presuming where someone has tried to lever the flywheel off. The flywheel is cracked, again I imagine due to harsh treatment, the magneto also seems to be not working. I tried an OHM test with no results so I'm not sure how else to try it. It makes sense because someone has put a coil on the side of it which makes me think they didn't or couldn't replace the magneto so just tried a coil to get it to work. They have also tried a new condenser. I'm unsure what to do now, I want to keep it original as possible BUT at the same time don't want to spend heaps of money getting all the original parts because like all my other tractors it will be a worker. The best thing would be to get a donor engine but I can't see that happening really.. Any help or advice would be appreciated! Tom
  11. Very cool photo and what a handy machine! I love the rear tyres on your 1886. Tom
  12. Tom

    Cub Cadet 70

    I love all the literature you have, very interesting with lots of useful information. I'd love some of those implements! Tom
  13. It does, it's a very weird mounting arrangement though.. Tom
  14. Tom

    Not another one...

    Sorry to see that you had to sell it, I did see it sell however and glad you got a good price. It will be interesting to see if your dads plough fits the cub! Tom
  15. Tom

    Not another one...

    It's certainly interesting, we will have to watch out for anymore. Correct me if I'm wrong but you have a wheel horse plough don't you? Does that fit your Cub? I ask as the clevis part seems quite wide to me, too wide for a brinly plough. Tom
  16. Tom

    Cub Cadet 70

    I see what you mean, I have to admit I hadn't seen one like this before, it's just weird how both Ewans and mine have an identical lift set-up. Tom
  17. Tom

    Not another one...

    Thanks Chris Hi Ewan, They seem to have got people thinking, I spoke to a chap in the US and he said that it wasn't original to the tractor but it's weird how they are both identical, unless it was something that was manufactured and fitted over here.. Tom
  18. Tom

    Cub Cadet 70

    Very nice Cub Ewan, you're also lucky to get all the manuals with it! Are you going to restore it or leave it? Tom I'm no Cub expert as I am new to them but I'm pretty sure the springs are factory as they were an option, from what I've read anyway. Apparently spring assist was an option to obviously help lift heavier implements. Tom
  19. Hi all, As part of the Cub cadet deal I got this plough thrown in, I have no clue what it is for, I am guessing it's for a pedestrian machine. There's still original paint on the mouldboard so it's never been used.. Any ideas? Tom
  20. Tom

    Not another one...

    As much as I'd like a Bolens I really can't buy no more for a while! I will just have to come round yours Iain and drive yours about Thanks Ian! I think I have been quite lucky recently with finding them close to me, usually they are all down your way or up North! It would be nice to get it running and stick a plough on it for rural past times, hmmm... Tom
  21. Tom

    Not another one...

    Hi Iain, I am certainly pleased it has the rear lift. I just plonked the engine on there for a picture There is actually a serial number on the reduction box, using a serial number date tool online it dated to January 1963. The registration plate was also registered in 1963. Tom
  22. Tom

    Not another one...

    Thanks for all the comments guys! Before it goes to any shows I need to get the engine running and bolted in properly! It has compression so fingers crossed there isn't too much wrong with it, time will tell.. Tom
  23. Tom

    Not another one...

    Sorry you were all wrong Cub cadet original made in January of 1963 with original registration plate registered in Norfolk.. What do you guys think? Tom
  24. Tom

    Not another one...

    You are too good Paul I wonder if you can guess the model!! Tom
 
×
×
  • Create New...